The Hood River News, Hood River, OR., April 10, 1925, page 1
PROPOSED UNION HIGH IS DEFEATED
While the projected formation of a union high school
district, embodying several districts of the lower valley, lost by the narrow
margin of four districts to three, the actual standing of the individual
votes gave the project a majority of 16 in favor. Until late on Friday night,
the verdict was in the balance, until it was definitely ascertained that
the small district of Viento, which polled but nine votes, had favored the
negative, with the result that the proposed union high school district had
been definitely put to sleep for the present.
To the man or woman who did not enter into the heat of
the contest, the outcome did not occasion any surprise, for outside of the
small groups comprising the "Ayes" and "Noes," there was little ambition
for the project -- or for any project with which necessitates a bond issue.
The fact is that, until the orchard business is attended by less of the downs
and more of the ups than in recent years, it is not going to be easy to secure
a workable majority for any project which necessitates a bond issue, especially
in the rural districts.
The four districts which returned a negative verdict
were: Pine Grove 126-66, Frankton, 43-26, Viento, 7-2 and Barrett, 83-62.
For the union high school district were: Hood River, 256-176, Oak Grove,
61-12, Wyeth, 13-3.
That vote for directors by district were as follows:
Hood River: C.A. Reed, 184; Dr. V.R. Abraham, 147; Pine
Grove, E.E. Lage, 88, A.W. Peters, 50; Oak Grove, Arvo Hukari, 59; Frankton,
Mrs. Wm. Skene, 30, Ed. Miller, 15; Wyeth, Mrs. Sara Rasmussen 14; Barrett,
C. King Benton, 87.
The total vote compiled by the candidates for the board
of directors in the combined districts is: C. King Benton, 558, Arvo Hukari
522; A.W. Peters 356; Mrs. Wm. Skene 336, Dr. V.R. Abraham 334, C.A. Reed
309, E.E. Lage 289, Ed. Miller 282 and Mrs. Sara Rasmussen 215.
It is conceded that the problem now reverts back to the
board of directors of School District No. 3, which will still have to contend
with an ever-increasing number of students to the city high school and lack
of accommodation. While there is some talk of excluding the students from
certain districts, it is believed that some other means of meeting the situation
will be evolved during the time that must elapse before the union high school
project is again presented to the voters.
[HOME]
© Jeffrey L. Elmer