Some of these very sources were used for my approved Colonial Dames
applications.  As was so well said.  Take the offered info and back it up
for yourself.  These books guide us on where to look for actual facts.

Faye
-----Original Message-----
From: Margaret B Miller 
To: [email protected] 
Date: Friday, January 07, 2000 5:58 PM
Subject: Re: Unacceptable sources per Colonial Dames XVII Century


Because of the numerson posts re POWG, I thought the following should be
>of interest to a lot of our serious researchers. The information is taken
>from "Seventeenth Century Review," published by the National Society
>Colonial Dames XVII Century. Found on pages 12 and 13.
>
> UNACCEPTABLE SOURCES
>
>"The following materials have been found lacking in source citations and
>will no longer be accepted as prooof. Previous applications or
>supplementals that used these sources will need to be proven against
>newer research based on original sources.
>
>Pioneers of the Wiregrass
>Notable Southern Families (Armstrong)
>Historical Southern Families (Boddie)
>Wilder and Some Connecting (espeically some Ware) Families in the
>Southeastern United States
>The Blakemore Family and Allied Lines
>The Goble Family descended from Thomas Goble of Charleston, Massachusetts
>The Stout Family
>The Freer Family
>Descendants of Philip and Ruth Dickerson Witten
>The Tilghman-Tillman Families
>Our Family Circle
>General Leroy Augustus Stafford
>The Ackerman Family
>The Brockman Scrapbook
>The Brockman Family in America"
>
> RESEARCH RESOURCE
>
>"Family History Library Salt Lake City"
>
>"The catalog of the world's premier genealogical library is now
>accessible through the Internet at FAMILY SEARCH.COM. Material in the
>Library may be borrowed through one of the local Family History Centers
>in your state. The address list of the Centers is included on the same
>Web page.
>
>"WARNING: this Web site includes the International Genealogical Index and
>other trademarked databases. The Society does not accept any material
>from these databases as proof at any time! The IGI is notorious for its
>errors. Use these databases at your own risk."
>
>Oophs!!! I was about to forget to say that the above information appeared
>in Volume 41, No. 3  Autumn 199.9. Sorry about that.
>
>Hope this will prove useful to someone.
>
>>
>
>
>
>

==== SCROOTS Mailing List ====