Re: NY>SC; 1671 - Edward L. Manigault
Subject: Re: NY>SC; 1671
From: Edward L. Manigault
Date: May 29, 2000

Not to be confused with the Jamestown that was north of Charleston on or
near the Santee River and long ago abandoned. It was also populated with
Huguenots.

Edward

-----Original Message-----
From: Doug Bostick 
To: [email protected] 
Date: Monday, May 29, 2000 12:21 PM
Subject: Re: NY>SC; 1671


Janet,
>
>As you may already know, that group was supposed to be the first group
>to settle on what is now James Island. The land laid out on James Island
>Creek was called Jamestown. There are several mysteries: 1) no plat or
>map has survived; 2) while they were supposed to be Dutch, the early
>James Island surnames are not Dutch; and 3) the exact location of
>Jamestown has never been verified- a dig two years ago produced very
>little in 17th century artifacts at the site thought to be Jamestown.
>
>Doug Bostick, Executive Director
>Sea Island Historical Society
>
>Janet Jilote wrote:
>
 Does anyone have information on a group of Dutch settlers
 who migrated from New York to SC in 1671?

 Janet Nielson Jilote






Go To:  #,  A,  B,  C,  D,  E,  F,  G,  H,  I,  J,  K,  L,  M,  N,  O,  P,  Q,  R,  S,  T,  U,  V,  W,  X,  Y,  Z,  Main