|
Subject: Re: McComb 1719 Judgement Roll
From: Jane McCombs Gillespie
Date: May 20, 1998
I don't think so.. when I ordered the copy of the microfilm it was indexed
under John McComb and on one of the sheets that the Archives have stamped it
says: Judgment Roll Frames 210-212 Blakeway Vs McCombs.. also there is a
place that looks like it was a "cover" of the papers and it looks like it
say Wm. Blakeway "ag" (against I guess) John McComb followed by 2 words I
can't read then appears to be 50 Filed Oct the 12th 1719.. the 2 words
following John McComb do not look anything like that Monk/Monh from the
other page..
-----Original Message-----
From: URQ5
To: [email protected]
Date: Wednesday, May 20, 1998 7:15 AM
Subject: Re: McComb 1719 Judgement Roll
In a message dated 98-05-19 22:50:46 EDT, you write:
>
><< it lists John McComb followed by what looks like Monk (or h
> instead of k) .. is this a title or something.. it follows John's name
like
> Esq. follows Blakeway.. >>
>
>Could this be the early SC name MONK aka MONCK ? We have had a couple of
MONK
>inquiries on this list.
>
>URQ
==== SCROOTS Mailing List ====
Go To:
#,
A,
B,
C,
D,
E,
F,
G,
H,
I,
J,
K,
L,
M,
N,
O,
P,
Q,
R,
S,
T,
U,
V,
W,
X,
Y,
Z,
Main
| |