Subject: Hostile English and French Naturalization From: Steven J. Coker Date: September 14, 1998 Transactions of the Huguenot Society of South Carolina No. 5. pp 19-26, Charleston, South Carolina, 1897. Press of Walker, Evans & Cogswell Co. HOSTILITY OF THE ENGLISH SETTLERS TO THE FRENCH. During the administration of Julius Blake, 1694-5, so great was the antipathy of the English settlers to the French refugees, that they insisted on their total exclusion from a voice in the Legislature. For this purpose an address was prepared and signed by a great number of them, and presented to Governor Blake, praying that the refugees be not only denied the privilege of sitting as members of the Assembly, but also of a vote at the elections, and also that the Assembly be composed only of English members, chosen by Englishmen. Their request, however, being contrary to the instructions of the Proprietors, Blake, it is probable, judged it beyond his power to grant, and therefore, matters relating to them continued in the same unsettled state until the arrival of Governor Archdale, which happened about the middle of the year 1695. (Hewitt's Hist. So. Ca.) It must be kept in mind that the French refugees, being aliens, were not entitled to the rights and privileges of citizenship, unless by a special Act of Assembly, and their compliance with the legal requirements imposed upon them. This is clearly shown in the Act of 1696-7, which declared that no person whatsoever, other than the persons herein expressly named, and who have already petitioned the House of Assembly for the liberties, privileges and immunities aforesaid, shall have any benefit thereby except such persons shall, within three months next ensuing, petition in writing, under their hands, the Right Hon. Joseph Blake, Esq., Governor. But many of the refugees had already been enfranchised by the Act of 1691, and it was doubtless for an exclusion of those from a voice in the Legislature and from a vote at the general elections that the English settlers petitioned the Governor, which he judged was beyond his power to grant. Such was the popular feeling when, about the middle of the year 1695, the administration of Governor Archdale commenced. The arrival of this pious man occaisioned no small joy among all the settlers, who crowded about him, each expecting some favor or indulgence. Amidst the general joy, private animosities and civil discord seemed for awhile to be completely buried. (Hewitt.) It was at this crisis, when peace and harmony were apparently restored, and political jealousies forgotten, that we may very reasonably suppose that the unenfranchised Huguenots would make the effort to obtain the rights and privileges of citizenship, and at this period the petition of 1696 was most probably prepared. Such was the national antipathy of the English settlers to the poor French refugees, that Archdale found their total exclusion absolutely necessary to the peaceable convocation of the delegates, and therefore issued writs directing them only to Berkeley and Colleton Counties. Ten members for the one and ten for the other. All Englishmen were accordingly chosen by the freemen of the same nation. (Hewitt.) As Berkeley County did not reach the Santee on the Northeast, and was bounded by the Stono on the Southwest, extending along the coast, and thirty-five miles into the interior, the Huguenots on the Santee were excluded from all participation in the election. The deposition of the two witnesses who were present when the votes were received for the Representatives in Berkeley County, gives us a practical illustration of the temper with which the election was conducted. The document is authentic and is as follows: The deponents say that on the 16th January last, they were in the house of Mr. Francis F. Fidling to see the delivery of votes for members of Assembly, and among others, Mr. James Lessade. Gentl, and Mr. Jonas Bonhope (Bonhoste) wheelright, being both natural born subjects of the French king, offer their votes to Colonel Robert Gibbes, Sherife, but he, the said Sherife, refused to take them without they could show either letters of naturalization or denization, which the aforesaid James Lessade and Jonas Bonhope answered that they had not any, but had lived in the country several years, and never before had been denied to vote for members of Assembly. The Sherife answered he could not take their votes. Then the aforesaid men, offering their votes againe, the Sherife answered he could not proceed further than orders, and further these deponents say not. ISAAC CAILLABÆF. Taken and sworn before me, this 25th day of May, 1696. VERA COP THOS. CAREY, ESQ. CHARLES ODINGSELSS. DAN SIRTY. "All the Governor could do for the French refugees," says Hewitt, "was to recommend it to the English freeholders to consider them in the most friendly and compassionate point of light, and to treat them with lenity and moderation." About the close of that year, 1696, Archdale resigned his office, and appointed Joseph Blake, son of the former Governor of that name, his successor. We have seen under what circumstances the representatives were elected, who composed the Legislative Assembly, convened subsequent to the supposed date of the document. We may readily suppose that the Huguenot refugees on the Santee, excluded as they had been from a voice in that election, and knowing the extreme national animosity cherished towards them by the members of that Assembly, would be reluctant to present themselves before that body as humble petitioners for rights and privileges to which they believed they were justly entitled, and which had wrongfully and by violence been withheld from them. That they were actuated by feelings of punctilious sensitiveness, is evident from the fact that of the 63 petitioners whose names are enumerated in the A. A., March 10th, 1696-7, only nine of them were residents on the Santee, and whose names are included in the "Liste des habitans de Santy qui sonhaitent d'être naturalizès Anglais." Hence, no doubt the reason that all further proceedings in the matter were suspended. Nor does it appear that they ever after petitioned the Assembly for the rights of citizenship. Some of them may have complied with the requirements of that Act, by petition to the Governor, and an oath of fidelity and allegiance to the King. The instructions communicated at different times by the Lords Proprietors to the Governors of the province, were dictated by a liberal policy as regarded the Huguenots. In 1691-2, Ludwell was directed to allow them equal rights and privileges with the English settlers, and to concede to them a representation in the Provincial Assembly, by six members chosen from among themselves. These designs were frustrated, however, by the national prejudice prevailing against them in the colony. Their political rights were abridged, and their religious privileges restrained as far as the government could accomplish the systematic plan of annoyance and oppression. It appears that a principle in the administration in reference to the refugees was to grant as a matter of favor, but to concede nothing as of right appertaining to them. Hence the requirement by the Assembly in the Act of 1696-97, that a petition be sent up before the rights of citizenship would be conferred. The Huguenots, on the other hand, were probably reluctant to ask a favor from those who were actuated by a spirit of hostility to them, believing as they did that their enfranchisement was already guaranteed to them by the official orders of the proprietors. When therefore, the Act was passed, in March, 1696-7, 'for making aliens free of this part of the province and for granting liberty of conscience to all Protestants," there were 63 petitioners only who were entitled by their application to the Assembly to the benefit of its provisions, and 36 only, the heads of families, whose names are inserted in the list of those "who wished to be naturalized English." From the public and private records of the time, there is unquestionable evidence that the 63 petitioners mentioned, composed but a very small number of those who had not then been admitted to the full enjoyment of civil and religious privileges, intended to be conferred by the Act. It was provided, however, that those who had not already petitioned, could have the benefit of the Act by application in writing to that effect, made to the Governor within three months from the date of its ratification, and by taking publicly an oath of allegiance to the King, certificates of which should be recorded in the Secretary's office, etc. All the requirements of the Act having been complied with, the Governor was empowered to give, under the seal of the province, to each applicant a certificate "of his being qualified for the benefit of the Act." There is in the possession of Daniel Ravenel, the senior one of the name of this, the 19th century, a certificate of Governor Blake's. issued in conformity with this Act, and referring to it by its date and title. It is the certificate of citizenship of one of the refugees in the petition of 1696, and bears date 4th June, 1697. CERTIFICATE OF CITIZENSHIP OR NATURALIZATION OF ELIAS PROLEAU. Cert. Naturalization Elias Prioleau, Minister of ye Gospel 1697, Carolina. The Rt. Hon'ble Joseph Blake, Esq., one of the true and absolute Lords and Proprietors of Carolina, Commander-in-Chief, Vice-Admiral and Governor General of South Carolina. To all Judges, Justices, Magistrates, Ministers and Officers, Ecclesiastical and Civil, and to all persons whatsoever, to whom this shall come to be seen, herd, read or known. - Greeting. Know ye that Elias Prioleau, Minister of ye Gospel, and Janne, his daughter, born under the allegiance of the King of France, hath taken the oath of allegiance to our most Royal Sovereign, William the Third, over England, Scotland, France and Ireland, King, Defender of the faith, and hath done every other thing which by Act of Assembly, made at Charlestown, in the ninth year of the Reign of our Sovereign Lord King William, Anno Dom. one thousand six hundred and ninety-six and seven, entitled an Act to make aliens free of this part of this Province, and for giving liberty of conscience to all Protestans, he was required to do, and fully and effectually, to all intents, construction and purposes qualified and capacitated, to have, use and enjoy all the privileges, powers and immunity of any person born in the kingdom of England, to certify which I have hereunto sett my hand and affixed the public seal of the province att Charlestown, this third day of June, Anno 1697. JOSEPH BLAKE. Recorded in the Secretary's office, June 4th, 1697 per me. J. A. MOORE, Secretary. The following are the names enumerated in the Act referred to, copied from the Statistics at large of South Carolina. They are inserted in alphabetical order for convenience of reference. John Annant,[1] Avila, Isaac Baton, Elias Bisset, Abel Bochet, Nicholas Bochet, Jonas Bonhost, Anthony Bonneau, Senr., Anthony Borean, Solomon Bremere, Moses Carrion, Claudius Caronne, John Carriere, Peter Collin, Jeremiah Cuttoneau, Nicholas deLonguemare, Sr., Nicholas de Longuemare, Junr., James Dubose, Peter Dugué, Abraham Dupont, Cornelius Dupré, Josiah Duprè, Senr., Josiah Dupré, Junr., Daniel Durousseau, Lewis Dutarque, Peter Eutarque, Daniel F[*]raisevent, Senr, Daniel F[*]raisevent, Junr., Charles Fromaget, Peter Gaillard, James Gallopin, Lewis Gourdin, Dr. Jacob Guerard, Peter Jacob Guerard, John Guerard, Mathieu Guérin, Daniel Jovett, George Juin, Lewis Juin, René Juin, James Lardant, John Libert, Nicholas Marant, (Mayrant) Joseph Marbæuf, Isaac Mazyck, Jacob Mendis, Augustus Mesmin, Philip Norman, Henry Peronneau, John Peteman, Peter Poinsett, Senr., Peter Poinsett, Junr., Anthony Poitevin, Senr., Anthony Poitevin, Junr., Peter Poitevin, Noah Royer, Noah Serre, Lewis Thisbon, John Thomas, Humphrey Torquet, Paul Torquet, Simon Valentin, Peter Videau. - Total, 63. The above list is interesting and valuable, as far as it goes, but it is not as complete as another list which was originally published by Daniel Ravenel above mentioned, and which was found among some old papers that had belonged to Henri de St. Julien, of St. John's Berkeley, who died in that parish at about 70 years of age, in 1768 or 9, and who was the youngest son of Pierre de St. Julien, whose name is included in the list. His papers passed into the hands of a sister, who survived all the other members of the family, and died at an advanced age in 1780, at a plantation in St. John's Berkeley, known as Wantoot. Mr. Ravenel was one of her descendants, and as there were other lists of French names, this one is generally known as the Ravenel list. Its contents were first published in the form of a contribution, in 1822, to the Southern Intelligencer, a religious paper issued weekly in Charleston. The total number of names then given was 119, the balance being so difficult to decipher that their publication was delayed, and it was not until the manuscript was confided to Mr. Louis Manigault, Sr. in 1867, that the total of 154 was reached. All the evidence attainable goes to prove that they are lists of petitioners for naturalization in 1696. They are copied verbatum in French, in Mr. Ravenel's pamphlet of 1867, and are reproduced similarly in a pamphlet by Theodore Gaillard Thomas, M. D., of New York city, in 1888, for private distribution. They are again similarly reproduced in French in these Transactions with all the inaccuracies of grammar and orthography of the original pamphlet. -------------------- 1 The following paper is inserted as exhibiting a curious "alias." An act to empower Charles Franchomme and Samuel Peronneau merchants, Elders of the French Church in Charleston, or their successors, elders of the said Church for the time being, to sell and alienate a certain tract of land in Berkeley County, devised to the poor of said Church, by Mary de Longuemare, alias Annant, to and for the use, benefit and advantage of the persons aforesaid. Grimké P. L. No. 59, A. A. 1714. [*] Indicates that a handwritten note reading "T" was found at this place in the document. These notes were made at unknown dates by persons unknown. No supporting reasons for the inserted corrections are found. Pages 27-46 of Transaction No. 5 are omitted here. These pages show the Ravenel Lists. Said lists having already been transcribed and reproduced in the SCRoots Forum and the DuBose Forum. ==== SCROOTS Mailing List ==== Go To: #, A, B, C, D, E, F, G, H, I, J, K, L, M, N, O, P, Q, R, S, T, U, V, W, X, Y, Z, Main |