Subject: French and Swiss Protestants (pp 3-8) From: Steven J. Coker Date: September 07, 1998 [... continued] [3] (From the "City Gazette," of Thursday, May 11, 1826.) The following numbers were published in the Southern Intelligencer in 1822. The list of families given in the fourth number, has enabled a Descendant of one of them to trace out a branch of the family remaining in France. This circumstance has led to an agreeable reciprocation of civilities and has increased the interest naturally attaching to so curious a document. In order to obtain for them a more extensive circulation, and that they may be more generally seen and perused, by the descendants of the French Refugees, these numbers are now published at the request of this gentleman. From the Southern Intelligencer. THE FRENCH REFUGEES. NO. I. The invention of Printing, and the early efforts of the Reformers, found the general mind fettered by ignorance and debased by superstition. While however, its latent energies were roused by the one; the other contributed to its enlightenment; and a great moral revolution was their necessary consequence. But important changes in the moral, like those in the material world, are attended by those deep and convulsive throes, by which Providence awakens the slumbering fears and affections of man. We are not then to be surprised at the eventful history of the revolution in religion and morals, which began to exhibit itself at the time alluded to. The gleams of a light but partially and imperfectly diffused, afforded an unfavorable medium through which to view the feelings, the motives and the objects of those who promoted the reformation. Where doubt exists of the tendency of new propositions, apprehension throws its weight into the scale, and determines us to the support of received opinions. Men of ordinary discernment, could scarcely fail to see in the reformation an engine of too much power to be disregarded. The opinions of the Reformers were therefore in the sober judgement of many, and through 4 the fears of more, dreaded as subversive of all the institutions of society; while bigotry and interest, fanaticism and superstition, magnified the evils, of which the new-born spirit of the times was deemed the prolific parent. "An opinion prevailed which had been zealously propagated by priests and implicitly received by sovereigns, that heresy was close-connected with rebellion, and that every great alteration in the church, involved a like revolution in the civil government." But opposition is the parent of zeal; persecution, of manly independence and perseverance. Efforts to counteract the new opinions, contributed in general to their progress and influence, - Inquiry was excited - intellect roused - and an impatience of that thraldom to which mankind in general had been subjected, became more and more apparent. The new opinions spread from town to town, from district to district, and from kingdom to kingdom, until their influence was felt throughout the whole civilized world. France participated largely in the civil commotions of which the reformation was so prolific. The opinions of the Reformers had made their way into France, and had encountered persecution in the reign of Francis the 1st, who came to the throne in 1515. Henry 2d, his son and successor, in 1559, issued an edict inflicting the penalty of death on dissenters, with an order to the judges "not to mitigate the punishment as had hitherto been the practise;" and it is said to have been "a point of honor, whether the one sect could exercise, or the other suffer most barbarity." On the death of Henry 2d this violence was greatly moderated, yielding to the natural influence of the steadfast and virtuous course pursued by the champions of the new doctrines - But in the subsequent reign, that of Francis 2d, (the first husband of the celebrated "Queen of Scots"), the execution of the penal statutes was revived; and several distinguished personages headed the Protestant party, among them the king of Navarre, the prince of Conde, and admiral Coligni, who, at much personal risk, gave a respectability and character to the party, which contributed not a little to increase its numbers. The first civil war between the Catholics and Hugonots took place in 1562, in the reign of Charles 9th, and after a very sanguinary conflict at Dreux, a peace was concluded in terms favorable to the latter. 5 A few years afterwards, the Queen Regent concluded with Philip of Spain, "the league of Bayonne," the object of which was the universal extermination of the Protestants by fire and sword. Conde and Coligni, having obtained information of the league, resolved to strike the first blow; and the battle of St. Dennis and the seige of Chartres produced an accommodation. In consequence, however, of a plan then formed to seize the prince and admiral, they escaped to Rochelle, and the war was renewed. In the battle of Yarnec, in 1569 Conde lost his life; and Coligni placed at the head of the Hugonots, the young prince of Navarre, (afterwards the celebrated Henry 4th). In this contest the fortune of war seemed against them, but such was the elastic spirit by which they were animated, that when Charles thought them almost annihilated, they presented themselves in formidable array in another quarter. Paris was threatened, and an accommodation concluded, by which liberty of conscience was allowed to the Hugonots. This accommodation was the basis of one of the most detestable and disgraceful instances of perfidy and cruelty which history records. Charles seemed studious to show that he was sincere in the arrangement with the Hugonots. He punished all who infringed it - and proposed a marriage between his sister and Henry of Navarre. A few days after the marriage, when many of the nobility whom the solemnity had brought to Paris, were still there, a general massacre took place by order of the king, who "himself (says Hume), in person led the way to the assassinations. The hatred long entertained by the Parisians against the Protestants, made them second without any preparation the fury of the court; and persons of every condition, age and sex, suspected of any propensity to that religion, were involved in an undistinguished ruin." "The streets of Paris flowed with blood, and the people more enraged than satiated with their cruelty as if repining that death had saved the victims from farther insult, exercised on their dead bodies, all the rage of the most licentious brutality. About 500 gentlemen and men of rank perished in the massacre, and near 10,000 of inferior condition. Orders were instantly dispatched to all the provinces for a like general execution of the Protestants; and in Rouen, Lyons and many othes cities, the people emulated the fury of the capitol." Many of the Protestants who lived near the frontier fled into England, Germany and 6 Switzerland, while those who lived in the interior escaped to the garrissons of their party. The Hugunots, the victims of a base and perfidious policy, though sad were unsubdued. they possessed at this time nearly one hundred cities, castles and fortresses, and in a short time had an army of 18,000 men. This massacre is called the massacre of St. Bartholomew, as it took place on the feast of St. Bartholomew, 24th August, 1572. Coligni, so long the vigilant supporter of the cause of the Hugonots, fell a victim to this barbarous policy. Henry, prince of Conde, and Henry, of Navarre, were spared, but were obliged to recant their tenets. In 1574 the war was renewed by Henry 3d. Henry of Navarre again joined the Hugonots, and strengthened their cause by the influence of his character and virtues. The Hugonots received an important accession of force from a German army under Conde, to the raising of which Elizabeth of England had contributed considerable sums. The fifth peace was concluded in 1576, and on better terms for the Hugonots than any former one. This peace, the result rather of the policy, than the sincerity of Henry, produced great discontent among the Catholics - "The holy league" was now formed to prevent the increase of any other than the established mode of worship. France now exhibited the strange spectacle of a nation divided into three parties, for though the king was a member of the league, the duke of Guise was its efficient head, and strengthened by the powerful pretext of religion, it became formidable to the throne itself; and the very existence of the league was inconsistent with the terms of pacification made with the Hugonots. Thus the Royalists, the Leaguers and the Protestants were armed against each other; the first party headed by the king, the second by Henry, duke of Guise, and the last by Henry, king of Navarre. This civil war has consequently been termed the war of the three Henries. On the death of the duke of Anjou in 1584, Henry of Navarre becoming heir presumptive to the throne, the league declared him incapable of the succession; and their army having entered Paris, the king sanctioned this declaration. The king, however, perceiving that the throne was the great aim of the policy of the duke of Guise, caused him and his brother to be assassinated; but this disgraceful act aroused the vengeance of the league against him and a decree of the Sorbonne re- 7 leased his subjects from their allegiance. In this state of things, Henry 3d joined the Protestant party, but soon afterwards while beseiging Paris he was assassinated by James Clement, a young Dominican friar, who led on by fanaticism, at the risk and expense of his own life, entered the Protestant camp for the purpose. It has been said of Henry, "that he spent his whole life in making war against the Protestants, and, at last he was murdered by the Catholics." Henry, king of Navarre, a Bourbon, was now the heir of the crown, but acknowledged by only a part of the nation. A war was conducted with various success, and Henry concluded at length to end it by what seemed the only means of obtaining a full recognition of his title - by the renunciation of the Protestant faith. He accordingly made a formal abjuration of it in the year 1593. The Edict of Nantz which guaranteed to the Protestants the full enjoyment of their faith and worship, the glory of this reign, was made in 1598. It was now upwards of 80 years since the bigotry of the times evincing its jealousy of the Protestant faith began to follow with bitter persecution those who embraced it! For the first 50 years, they groaned under hardships which it was probably imprudent to resist. General, open and decided resistance, as we have seen, first took place in 1562, and from this time to the issuing of the edict of Nantz, a period of only 36 years, France had experienced no less than six civil wars, founded on differences in religious faith. Although there must have been much of devoted attachment to the doctrines and establishments of religion, to render the feeling connected with them so powerful an engine, we are not to attribute these civil wars to motives merely religious. Religion furnished a ready pretext to ambitious men, which bigotry rendered subservient to their views. The period which elapsed from the passage of the edict of Nantz to its final revocation was about 87 years. But party spirit had excited too many prejudices and animosities on both sides, and the active efforts of the Hugonots had made them too secure to allow an empire under such circumstances to remain in uninterrupted peace. No very general serious disturbance took place till 1621 - when the Hugonots, offended at the court, held a consultation at Rochelle, the result of which was a civil war of a year's duration, which ended in merely a confirmation of the edict of Nantz. The profess- 8 ed object of this revolt was nothing less than to make France a republic - an object too serious and alarming in its nature to allow the government to remain satisfied, while a numerous party, discontented both from principle and habit, upon those subjects too, by which the spirit of revolt was most easily roused, were so powerful at least for defence. The state of the party was inconsistant with enlightened policy; it being in many respects imperium in imperio. It was therefore one of the objects of the celebrated Richelieu, who became the minister of Louis 13th in 1624, to reduce the power of the Hugonots. Rochelle was their strong hold. In 1627 this city was beseiged. But it being impossible to take it, while the communication with the sea remained open, Richelieu constructed an immense mole across the harbour, a mile in length, and thus reduced the city to famine. After a fourteen months seige it surrendered on condition that the inhabitants should retain their property and the free exercise of their religion. The cardinal had the fortifications demolished - after which the other fortified places successively yielded to the power of the government. Thus was the great object, fully accomplished. The Protestants were no longer an independant and distinct people in the kingdom. Louis 14th was like his predecessor, fortunate in having another Richelieu in Cardinal Mazarin, who maintained the tranquility of the empire and increased the power of the monarch. He was also much indebted to the genius of Colbert, whose financial efforts multiplied the resources of the government. Under his care and patronage, commerce and manufactures flourished. The Protestants, many of whom were engaged in manufactures, participated in his favour. But soon after the death of this great man who so well understood the true happiness of his country, Louis in 1685 revoked the edict of Nantz; and the horrors of persecution were again the disgrace and the scourge of France. A Descendant of the Refugees. [to be continued ...] ------- Spelling and capitalizations all sic, forgiving any transcription errors. Transcribed by Steven James Coker from a copy of an original in the holdings of the Caroliniana Library in Columbia, South Carolina. Catalog number: s.c. p975.793 R19l 1868 ==== SCROOTS Mailing List ==== Go To: #, A, B, C, D, E, F, G, H, I, J, K, L, M, N, O, P, Q, R, S, T, U, V, W, X, Y, Z, Main |