Origin of the Nickens Family and Name
by Jan Nickens Valdez
November 2016
The Nickens family in the United States originated in early Lancaster
County, Virginia. The name Nickens itself also originated
there. Based on research in Lancaster County records, Nickens appears to be a shortened version of the name Yoconohawcon/Yoconohanacon/Yoconhawkon (spelling varies in Lancaster County
records). The shortened name was first Nicken,
and then later Nickens. The first occurrence found to date of the name Nicken/Nickens in the US is
in 1709 Lancaster County, Virginia when Elizabeth Nicken
apprenticed her son Richard Nicken. In 1713 in
the same county an Edward Nicken applied to be
administrator of the estate of his father, Richard Nicken.
Evidence suggests that this Richard Nicken was a
former slave who was freed in Lancaster County, along with his wife Chriss and three of their daughters, by John Carter in
1690. In the second paragraph of Carter's
will of 4 June 1690 he stated:
First. I doe give Black Dick
and Chriss his Wife after the finishing of the Crop
that is now on the Grounde their Freedom, and I doe give each of them a Cow and Calfe
and three barrells of Corn a peece,
and I doe likewise give them so much ground upon the
Land I bought of Nicholas Wren and old Clapham, for
their lives so they may tend with houses convenient for them and timber for casques. And Likewise Chrisses
youngest Daughter, I set free along with her, and likewise, I doe give Diana and Little Chriss
their Freedom when they come to the age of Eighteen yeres,
and that they in the meantime remaine with my Wife,
And I doe give each of them a yearling heifer with
their encrease until they come to halfe
a dozen to run along with my Wifes stock of cattle,
and all the rest of theire encrease
I give unto my Wife (Lancaster County Will Book 8:5).
Why is it believed that Richard Nicken was the Dick named in John Carter's will?
Lancaster County tax records show a man with various names such as free Dick,
Black Dick, and free Richard for the next few years He
was taxed in Christ Church Parish, the same parish where John Carter had lived
and where his heir Robert Carter continued to live. Then, in 1704 Richard Yoconohawcon was
on the tax list, listed near the same individuals as Dick was in previous
years. In 1706 the names free Dick and Richard Yoconohawcon are found in the same court record. Richard died later that year, and his wife Criss Yoconohawcon was granted administration of his estate. In 1709
Edward Yoconohacon was on the Christ Church Parish
tax list. There is then a gap until 1712 when Edward Nicken is sued. In 1713 Edward Nicken was identified as son of Richard Nicken.
Putting these and other pieces of information together, it is apparent that Richard Yoconohawcon, Richard Nicken and
Black Dick/free Richard were the same person.
The only other individual who was identified
in the Lancaster records with the surname Yoconohawcon
was Martha Yoconohawcon, daughter of Criss. Chriss appeared in Lancaster records several times, and two
of her probable children were later named as Nicken.
Therefore, Elizabeth, Chriss and Edward were probably
children of Richard and Chriss who were freed by the
will of John Carter. .
Who were Dick and Chriss?
An obvious assumption since they were given their freedom in a will is that
they were slaves of African descent. However, they took a name that is
apparently Native American, Yoconohawcon, which
suggests one, or both of them may have been Native American or part Native
American. This would not be unusual as
many natives were enslaved in the colonies' early years. But we also
might surmise that they, or one of them, or their children may have also been
part European. This family was shown clear favoritism by being given their
freedom. Carter owned 100 slaves when he died, and he only freed these
five. His father, also John Carter, first settled in Lancaster County in
the 1650s and also owned slaves. Thus by the time John Carter, Jr. freed
Dick and Chriss, the Carter family had been slave
owners in the county for 40 years, so Dick or Chriss
could have even been second generation members of their families to be slaves
of the Carters. Dick and Chriss were well
provided for, being given land to use during their lives and cattle. Also
notice the relative wealth bestowed on the two girls who were probably
daughters of Chriss, although they are not
specifically named as such. On the other hand, for the next few years
Edward, Criss and Elizabeth were referred to several
times in Lancaster County records as free negroes, or
negroes. Therefore we can assume they were also part African. By the
1750s some descendants were being identified as mulatto, an indication of their
mixed heritage. Of course we can only speculate about the actual ancestry
of Dick and Chriss--there are no records which
identify their race/ethnicity-- but their descendants were clearly of mixed
ancestry.
For the next 160 years descendants were
identified as free people of color. From Lancaster County descendants
moved throughout Virginia, to North Carolina, Tennessee, Ohio, Louisiana and
several other states. The various family lines
diverged and incorporated many other family lines, but everywhere they went,
with a few exceptions, they were usually identified as mulatto or free people
of color, until that term became obsolete after the Civil War.
So what are the Nickens? Well obviously our
particular ancestry depends on what other families our ancestors married into.
Through the many generations each of our family lines intermarried with many
other families. Some married others with more African ancestry and became
part of the African American population. Others married spouses with more
European ancestry and became part of the white population. Others
identify today as Native Americans. A few consider themselves a distinct
people, recognizing a mixed heritage, but not claiming a particular
"racial" identity. Clearly there is no single answer as to who or what they were and are. Their identities
were shaped by their own circumstances, the
attitudes of people around them, and historical processes. The bottom
line is that they are a very interesting family and, as a group, are a
reflection of changes in how we have perceived race and ethnicity through time
and illustrate that race is a fluid, and socially defined idea.
Some Published Sources on Nickens:
Research into the history of the Nickens has
been aided by other researchers who pointed the way to Lancaster County as the
origin of the Nickens. The earliest work with information on the Nickens was
written by Luther Porter who published a book entitled Virginia Negro
Soldiers and Seamen in the Revolutionary War. A 1972 dissertation at
Brown University by Robert Wheeler, Lancaster County, Virginia, 1650-1750: The Evolution of a Southern Tidewater Community
also discussed some of the Lancaster County records relating to this
family. Karen Sutton presented a paper to the Federation of Genealogical
Societies Conference in 1994 entitled The Nickens Family, Non-Slave African
American Patriots. She has since completed a thesis on Nickens in the
Revolution, and is continuing to research Lancaster County Nickens and related
families. Also in 1994 a book was published by Paul Heinegg,
Free African Americans of North Carolina and Virginia which identifies
many records relating to the pre-Civil War free population. This is a
useful source for finding the counties where early Nickens and related families
were residing in Virginia and North Carolina. In 1996 early Lancaster
County Nickens were discussed in a book by Kathleen M. Brown, Good Wives,
Nasty Wenches and Anxious Patriarchs. In 1998 the Nickens were used as a
case study in an article, The Pot that Called the Kettle White: Changing
Racial Identities and U.S. Social Construction of Race by Norberto
and Janice Valdez.
This page is part of the Nickens Family
Resource Page and is maintained by Jan Valdez [email protected]
Copyright 2000 by Jan
Valdez. All rights reserved.