Editorial
Humboldt Journal
June 20, 2002
By Bill Hancock
b.hancock@sk.sympatico.ca
Almost everyone has a family member who keeps track of the family
tree.
Perhaps it is an elderly aunt, perhaps a younger person, but
without
exception there is always someone who seems to know almost everything
about past relatives - where they came from, what they did, how
many
kids they had, what they did for a living, even how many cows
they
owned. Occasionally a person discovers that some previously forgotten
family member was a bit of a troublemaker, like one rural family
who
found they were related to Pretty Boy Floyd, the notorious gangster.
It
was a source of entertainment for the family for years and it
provided
the occasional comedic moment whenever someone feared one of
the kids
might end up the same way if he didn't learn to drive a little
slower.
Good or bad news for families looking into their pasts, the point
is
that the information was important to them and there is no logical
reason why anyone would want to intentionally prevent them from
finding
it.
That's precisely what's happening, however. During the course
of talking
recently with Humboldt citizens who are descendants of British
Home
Children, a point was brought up that efforts to research their
own
families was being hampered by Canada's Chief Statistician, Dr.
Ivan P.
Fellegi, who refuses to release post-1901 Census information
on the
excuse that a promise was made never to release or reveal any
of the
information collected. There's just one small problem - through
court
actions and committee testimony, no evidence has been presented
that a
promise was ever made. That apparently doesn't matter to
Dr. Fellegi,
who continues to resist releasing the Census to the National
Archivist.
Fellegi's obstinacy means all Canadians, not just the millions
of
descendants of Home Children, are denied access to information
about
their own predecessors.
England, Scotland and Wales release their Census information after
100
years and the United States releases its information after 72
years so
families can discover their own heritage. In Canada, Parliament
decided
years ago that 92 years was sufficient for keeping secret how
many cows
and chickens Uncle Herbert and Aunt Sally had way back when,
yet Dr.
Fellegi seems to be the only person standing in the way of full
disclosure. In effect, a bureaucrat is overruling the will of
Parliament
in letter and spirit.
This unnecessary, embarrassing fiasco is making our country look
ridiculous to outside observers and Canadian citizens alike,
and the
majority of MPs and Senators who support access to post-1901
Census
information should be raising sheer hell about it. They would
be wise to
act quickly before this matter becomes an even larger issue.
BH