The
Clopton Chronicles
A Project of the Clopton Family Genealogical
Society
Saint
Crispin’s Day
Regarding
William Clopton, Knt., & His Uncle,
Thomas Erpingham, K.G.
By John Henry Knowlton, [email protected], &
Suellen Clopton Blanton, [email protected] [1]
We few, we happy few, we band of brothers.
For he today that sheds his blood with me
shall be my brother; be he ne’er so vile,
this day shall gentle his condition.
And gentlemen in England now abed
shall think themselves accursed they were not
here,
and hold their manhoods cheap whiles any
speaks
that fought with us upon Saint Crispin’s day.
Henry V - William Shakespeare[2]
It is truly a beautiful thing to behold
one or two thousand tame swans
upon the River Thames.
The last half of the
fourteenth century saw the Cloptons migrate from their ancestral English
environs of Wickhambrook,[3]
and began to imprint the indelible mark of the family upon the history of East
Anglia. It was a thrilling time as
countries locked in battle for control of England; kings were murdered and
deposed, armies marched and old noble names were ruined while rising dynasties
seized power and lands.
The
Black Death[4] of the
fourteenth century left in its wake a large proportion of England’s inhabitants
dead, entire villages abandoned.
With less competition, many survivors were able to grow rich beyond
their wildest dreams. Peasants
were now able to negotiate cash wages in return for their labor. This cornucopia did not go
unnoticed. The Italian scholar
Polydore Vergil,[5] was
impressed by what he saw.
[In England is found]
delectable valleys, pleasant, undulating hills, agreeable woods, extensive
meadows, lands in cultivation, and the great plenty of water springing
everywhere. It is truly a
beautiful thing to behold one or two thousand tame swans upon the River
Thames. The riches of England are
greater than those of any other country in Europe. There is no small innkeeper, however poor and humble he may
be, who does not serve his table with silver dishes and drinking cups.
There were many who wished
to have the glittering gem as their own, none so impassioned than the
French. At the same time, Henry V[6] longed to renew Edward III’s
claims to the throne of France.[7] Not only would victories abroad restore
England’s somewhat tarnished prestige but they would also give the people
confidence in the Lancastrian dynasty.
And that is how Sir William
Clopton,[8]
would find himself along side his uncle, Sir Thomas Erpingham[9]
on a cold and wet morning in 1415 facing the flower of French chivalry.
Following
an unexpectedly long march in an attempt to find a practicable ford over the
Sommes, during
the mid-point of the Hundred Years’ War,[10] an exhausted army of 6,000 Englishmen,
led by Henry V, was caught at Agincourt.[11] The French force, numbering between 20,000 and 30,000 men, under the
constable Charles I d’Albret, blocked the road to
Calais.
On October 25, Saint Crispin’s Day, 5,000 archers stood
waiting at Agincourt. King Henry V
called to him the husband of Joan Clopton, the distinguished marshal of his
army, Sir Thomas Erpingham. Sir Thomas brought them into position. The elderly knight tossed his baton
into the air and cried 'Nestrocque,"[12]
his command answered with roars which echoed across the gentle countryside soon
to be drenched in blood. And thus began one of the most famous battles in
history, the Battle of Agincourt.[13]
It would be the skills of the
English archers,[14] under the
command of Sir Thomas, that would prove the decisive factor.
The French were so packed together
that many could not raise their arms to use their weapons.
The bodies began to pile up
until they had to climb up to get at the English.
It was a bloodbath.
Understanding the military
advantages of the longbow, King Henry II[15]
mandated that men with a net worth of two to five pounds
or more should own and practice with a longbow[16]
to defend the nation. Churches
were required to set aside a butt, or target, in a marked area for archers to
hone their skills. For archery was
an art that took practice. A great
deal of practice.
The English longbow was an
unforgiving weapon. Anyone could
pick one up and fire an arrow, but the key was being able to hit the target
consistently and to be able to fire rapidly. A good archer could fire from six to twelve arrows[17]
a minute. This was critical when
one considers facing a charging knight on horseback. The more arrows fired the better the chance of hitting the
knight or his horse and surviving the encounter.
The armor[18]
that the knights wore on their torsos and heads was thick enough that arrows
would have a difficult time piercing it.
But the armor on their arms and leg was thinner. The horses had less armor and could be
brought down, thus dismounting the knight. At Agincourt, the English archers had another advantage.
At first the French would
not attack the English. After
sitting for four hours in battle array, King Henry gave the order to advance to
within three hundred yards of the French,
maximum range for the longbows.[19] Henry V ordered Sir Thomas to inspect
his men to insure that they were in order and that they had their bows strung
and arrows ready.[20]
Sharpened stakes were driven
in front of the archers to protect them from the French knights charging on
horseback. Sir Thomas then gave
the order to fire the first volley of arrows. This was all it took to spur the French to action.
The French leaders tried to
restrain their knights but to no avail. The mounted French knights, who had
been placed on the flanks of the French army, impulsively charged. Their horses churned the ground
into a mire. It had been raining for two weeks prior to the battle and
the ground was saturated. King
Henry had positioned his troops in such a way that the initial advance of the
French was across marshy ground, and he kept his own armored cavalry in reserve
until the charge of the French cavalry had been thrown into confusion by his
archers. The field at its best
places was ankle deep in mud. In
the worst places there were reports of the mud being up to the bellies of the
horses, waist deep on a man.[21] The French knights would fall from their
disabled mounts and become mired in the mud.
The English archer's arrows
brought down the first ranks.[22] The noise of
horses and riders screaming in pain covered the battlefield.
The following ranks could
not see what was happening and rode on top of the fallen men and horses and
were killed also. Rider less
horses ran in panic through the French infantry advancing behind the
knights. The archers of Sir Thomas
were pitiless and poured the arrows into the tightly massed ranks of French
infantry. The French infantry
slogged forward with their heads slightly down because they knew if they looked
up an English arrow would come through the eye slit in their helmet. Men were
falling as arrows penetrated their leg armor and other lightly armored areas of
their bodies. The entire length of
the field was a killing zone.
A kneeling statue
of Sir Thomas Erpingham is in a niche in the center of the tall flint-faced
gable of the Erpingham Gate at Norwich Cathedral.
The French infantry came to
the piles of dead and dying knights and horses and began to climb over
them. All the time they saw their
comrades falling around them hit with English arrows. The impact of the French infantry drove the English line
back several yards but it held.
The French were so packed together that many could not raise their arms
to use their weapons.[23] The bodies began to pile up until they
had to climb up to get at the English.
It was a bloodbath.[24]
The French died in the
thousands of arrows, weapon strikes by English men-at-arms, and of falling and
being suffocated by the weight of their own comrades trying to climb over
them. The archers joined the
men-at-arms in the butchery that followed. The closely packed French
knights and infantrymen that were mired in the mud were killed without pity.[25] The French faltered and then fled. Over 2,000 prisoners were taken after the French attack disintegrated.[26]
Then the French second wave
began to advance and King Henry ordered the killing of the prisoners. The second wave faltered and fled but
not before a number of prisoners had been killed.[27] The prisoners were worth ransom money
and therefore more valuable alive than dead.
As the English looked across
the battlefield they said it looked rather odd because in places the feathered
ends of the arrows that they had fired were so thick it appeared there was snow
on the ground.
They had done their work too
well. The field was now covered
with over 5,000 French dead.[28] The English losses were negligible.[29] The English longbow was a death
instrument in the hands of the experienced English yeomen archers. All the bravado in France could not
ignore the fact that Sir Thomas and his yeomen archers had destroyed a
generation of French nobility on that muddy field near Agincourt.
May the Dedicated Service of William Shakespeare;s
“Good Old Commander” and most kind Gentleman
Ever Be remembers and his Soul Rest in Peace.
Sir
Thomas’ role at Agincourt was immortalized not only in history but also in fiction. In William Shakespeare play, Henry
V, 4.1.17, on the eve of the battle, Sir Thomas rejects King Henry’s
suggestion that his “good old commander,” is too elderly to sleep on the hard
ground. Sir Thomas replies that he
enjoys being able to say, “Now Lie I like a king.” King Henry then congratulates him on his spirit, thus
contributing to the episode’s emphasis on the high morale of the English army.[30]
Sir
Thomas is buried on
the north side of the presbytery at Norwich Cathedral with his two wives, Joan Clopton
and Joan Walton[31] A plaque reads:
SIR
THOMAS ERPINGHAM, K.G.
1357 – 1428
A GALLANT SOLDIER AND
GENEROUS BENEFACTOR LIES BURIED WITH HIS TWO WIVES NEAR THIS SPOT. In 1399 HE WAS ONE OF THE COMMISSIONERS
TO WHOM RICHARD II SURRENDERED HIS CROWN AND IN 1415 AS MARSHALL OF KING HENRY
V’S ARMY AND COMMANDER OF HIS ARCHERS, HE PLAYED A PROMINENT PART AT THE BATTLE
OF AGINCOURT. LOCALLY HE FUNDED
THE REBUILDING OF THE DOMINICAN FRIARY NOW KNOWN AS ST. ANDREWS AND BLACKFRIARS
HALLS AS WELL AS THE ERPINGHAM GATE LEADING INTO THE CATHEDRAL CLOSE AND WAS
LARGELY RESPONSIBLE FOR NORIWCH OBTAINING ITS MOST IMPORTANT CHARTER.
MAY THE DEDICATED SERVICE OF
WILLIAM SHAKESPEARE’S “GOOD OLD COMMANDER” AND MOST KIND GENTLEMAN EVER BE
REMEMBERED AND HIS SOUL REST IN PEACE.
Opposite the west door of the
Cathedral is the Erpingham Gate, given about the year 1420 by Sir Thomas
Erpingham, whose chantry is in the Presbytery. It is very richly cared on the outside, with statues of the
apostles and of female saints set in canopied niches in the arch
mouldings. The Clopton arms are
replicated dozens of times, either by itself or with Erpingham impaling
Clopton. An attractive paving was
laid from the gate to the west door in 1968-71.
Detail showing Erpingham
impaling Clopton. In other words,
the left half of the shield is Sir Thomas’ arms and the right half, the arms of
Joan Clopton’s father.
Sir William Clopton would
return to Long Melford following the battle, however, any joy he may have felt
was short lived. It is thought a
plague visited the countryside, and in 1420, his first wife, Margery Drury,
their son William, and two daughters died. His second wife, Margery Francis, would died in 1424.[32]
1. Walter7 Clopton, Lord of
Chiperley Manor (William6,
Walter5, William4, Walter3, William2,
Guillaume1 Peche, Lord Of Cloptunna and Dalham)1
died 1327 in Poslingford, County Suffolk, possibly, and believed to be buried
at The Church of the Blessed Mary, near Chipley Priory2. He married (1) Alice FitzHugh3,
daughter of Warin FitzHugh. She
died Aft. 1289 in Poslingford, County Suffolk, possibly, and believed to be
buried at The Church of the Blessed Mary, near Chipley Priory4. He married (2) Anwett or Ivetta
Weyland5.
She died Aft. 1338 in Poslingford, County Suffolk, possibly, and
believed to be buried at Chipley Priory, Clare6.
Children of Walter Clopton
and Alice FitzHugh are:
+ 2 i. William8 Clopton,
Knt., Lord of Toppesfield Manor, died Bet. January 22, 1375/76 and January 14,
1376/77 in England and buried in Babwell Friary.
+ 3 ii. Thomas Clopton, Knt, of
Kentwell Estate, Suffolk, died Bet. March 8, 1381/82 and October 12, 1383 in
Long Melford, County Suffolk, and buried at the Church of the Blessed Mary,
near Chipley Priory.
Child of Walter Clopton and
Anwett Weyland is:
4 i. John8 Clopton, of
Chiperley Manor, died Aft. 1338 in Poslingford, County Suffolk, possibly, and
believed to be buried at Chipley Priory, Clare.
Generation
No. 2
2. William8 Clopton, Knt.,
Lord of Toppesfield Manor (Walter7, William6, Walter5,
William4, Walter3, William2, Guillaume1
Peche, Lord Of Cloptunna and Dalham)7 died Bet. January 22,
1375/76 and January 14, 1376/77 in England and buried in Babwell Friary8. He married (1) Amitia or Ivetta
Grey, of Buckenham Castle9, daughter of Thomas Grey,
Knt., of Buckenham Castle, Norfolk.
She was born in England.
Buckenham, County Norfolk, is about 8 miles southeast of Norwich. It is reported that her daughter
Johane, was born at Paston, Norfolk, about 22 miles north of Norwich. None of this has been confirmed. He married (2) Mary Cockerell, of
Toppesfield Manor, Hadleigh10, daughter of William
Cockerell, Knt, of Toppesfield Manor.
Children of William Clopton
and Amitia Grey are:
5 i. William9 Clopton,
of Hawstead Manor11, died in Hawstead Manor, County Suffolk,
possibly, about 4 miles southwest of Bury St. Edmunds and may be buried at All
Saints, Hawstead. He married
Chewyt; died in Hawstead Manor, County Suffolk, possibly, about 4 miles
southwest of Bury St. Edmunds and may be buried at All Saints, Hawstead.
6 ii. Walter Clopton, of
Toppesfield Manor, Hadleigh12, died Aft. May 5, 1413 in
Toppesfield Manor, probably, and possibly
buried at Holy Trinity Church, Long Melford, County Suffolk13. He married Elizabeth Peccott14;
died in Toppesfield Manor, probably, and possibly buried at Holy Trinity Church, Long Melford, County Suffolk.
The
1612 Visitation of Essex refers to Sir Walter as a Knight of the
"Roodes." States he was
the third son by the second wife.
7 iii. Edward Clopton, of Newnham
Hall, Ashdon, Essex15, died 1389 in Newenham Hall, Ashdon,
County Essex16.
He married Blanche FitzEustice.
8 iv. Johane Clopton, of
Toppesfield Manor, Hadleigh17, born in Paston, County
Norfolk, possibly, about 22 miles north of Norwich. She married (1) Walter Walcote, of County Norfolk. She married (2) Roger Beauchamp, 2nd
Baron Beauchamp of Bletsho1819; born Abt. 1363 in Bletsoe,
County Bedfordshire, about 24 miles west of Cambridge, County Cambridgeshire20;
died May 3, 140621.
She married (3) John Cavendish, Knt.22.
Johane
married into one of the most eminent and powerful families, the
Beauchamps. A companion in
arms of the victorious William the Conqueror, the family was represented by the
Earls of Warwick and Albemarle, and, the Barons of St. Amand, Barons of Bletsho,
Hache, Kydderminster and Powyke.
Counted among her direct descendants are most of the Kings and Queens of
England who have held the throne since Henry, VII.
9 v. Joan Clopton, of Wickhambrook
& Norwich23, died 1404 in England and buried on the north
side of the presbytery at Norwich Cathedral, County Norfolk24. She married Thomas Erpingham, K.G.,
Lord Marshall of England25 Aft. 138026;
born 1357; died 1428 in England and buried on the north side of the presbytery
at Norwich Cathedral, County Norfolk27.
The opposite side of the Erpingham Gate is very
plain, with diagonal buttresses and the gable plastered and Sir Thomas’ arms as
the only ornament.
Child of William Clopton and
Mary Cockerell is:
10 i. Thomas9 Clopton,
of Toppesfield Manor28.
3. Thomas8 Clopton, Knt, of
Kentwell Estate, Suffolk (Walter7, William6, Walter5,
William4, Walter3, William2, Guillaume1
Peche, Lord Of Cloptunna and Dalham)29 died Bet. March 8,
1381/82 and October 12, 1383 in Long Melford, County Suffolk, and buried at the
Church of the Blessed Mary, near Chipley Priory30. He married Katherine Mylde, of
Clare, Suffolk3132, daughter of William Mylde, of Clare,
County Suffolk. She died Bet.
February 24, 1402/03 and June 18, 1403 in Tendring Hall, Stokes-by-Nayland,
County Suffolk, about 6 miles southwest of Hadleigh, and buried The Church of
St. Mary the Virgin, before the altar in the South Chapel33.
After Sir Thomas' death,
Dame Katherine took as her second husband Sir William de Tendring of
Stoke-by-Nayland. Through this
marriage she became the distant grandmother of three queens of England: two of
the unfortunate wives of Henry the VIII, Ann Boleyn and Catherine Howard, and
Queen Elizabeth I. Dame Katherine, who died in 1403, is buried at the Church of
St. Mary the Virgin, Stoke-by-Nyland, Suffolk. Their memorial brasses are among
the finest in England. The Clopton
Arms: ermine spot on the bend in
base may be seen on the mantle of the depiction of Dame Katherine. The descendants of William Clopton and
his wife, Ann Booth, are direct descendants of Guillaume Peche and Alfwen, his
wife, by both the Clopton-Mylde marriage and the Mylde deTendring marriage.
See "Place of
Lutons."
Children of Thomas Clopton
and Katherine Mylde are:
11 i. William9 Clopton,
Knt., of Long Melford34, born in Long Melford, County
Suffolk, England35; died August 1446 in Long Melford, County
Suffolk, England and buried in the North Aisle of the Clopton Chancel of Holy
Trinity Church, Long Melford36. He married (1) Margery Drury, of Rougham37;
born in Rougham, County Suffolk,
about 3 miles southeast of Bury St. Edmunds and possibly baptized at St. Mary38;
died June 19, 1420 in England and buried Holy Trinity Church, Long Melford in
the North Aisle of the Clopton Chancel39. He married (2) Margery Francis, of
County Norfolk40 Bef. 1423 in County Norfolk, probably; died
June 12, 1424 in Long Melford, County Suffolk, England and buried Holy Trinity
Church, Long Melford and buried in the North Aisle of the Clopton Chancel41.
12 ii. Thomas Clopton, of Long
Melford, Suffolk42, died Aft. 138243.
Endnotes
1. Walter Clopton of Wickhambrook, 22 E. 1, when he bought
lands in Chipley, &c. See deeds, Harleian Manuscript 380.
2. Hervy, The Visitation of Suffolk 1561, (Courtesy of Suellen (Clopton) DeLoach
Blanton), p. 23, Their son, Sir Thomas Clopton, stated in his will that he
wished to be buried between his mother's and wife's [first wife, possibly)
grave in the Church of the Blessed Mary of Chipley Priory.
3. D'Ewes Collections, Harleian Manuscripts No. 380,
"Walter de Clopton soone and heire of William de Clopton of Wikhambroke,
married to his first wife Alice, the daughter and coheire of William, commonly
sirnamed Fitzhugh, sonne of Hugh de Warrenna. Hee died temp. E. II."Arms: -- Clopton, impaling on a cross five escallops.
4. Harleian Manuscript No. 380, British Museum, A deed of
partition of lands dated Wednesday after the Feast of the Apostle James, the
17th Edward I (1289) between "the same FitzHugh between Robert de Sevlisho
and Mabel his wife of the one part, and the said Walter de Cloptone and Alice
his wife, sister of the said Mabel, of the other part."
5. D'Ewes. Harleian M.S. 10, See also Harleian Charter,
51 A. 48; and D'Ewes, Harleian Manuscript 639.
6. Harleian Charters 51 A. 48, British Museum, Bearing the date
11th Edward III (1338) a deed refers to Anwett, "once the wife of Walter
Cloptone and her son John."
7. Hervy, The Visitation of Suffolk 1561, (Courtesy of Suellen (Clopton) DeLoach
Blanton), p. 22, 23, States he was called Sir William Clopton. "Breviary of Suffolk," as
does the Visitation 1561, associates Cockrell with Cloptons. Cockrell - Ermyn on a fesse azure 3
lions rampant or.
8. Hervy, The Visitation of Suffolk 1561, (Courtesy of Suellen (Clopton) DeLoach
Blanton), p. 22, His will was dated January 22, 1376, proved in Norwich January
14, 1377. Stated he was
"William de Clopton, son of Walter de Clopton of Wykhambrok, cormorans in
Wykhambroke, miles." see Cur.
Ep. Norw. 1376.
9. Hervy, The Visitation of Suffolk 1561, (Courtesy of Suellen (Clopton) DeLoach
Blanton), p. 22, She was the daughter and co-heir of Sir William Cockerell, of
Toppesfield Manor in Hadleigh.
10. Hervy, The Visitation of Suffolk
1561, (Courtesy of Suellen
(Clopton) DeLoach Blanton), p. 22, States she was the daughter and co-heir of
Sir William Cockerell, of Toppesfield Manor in Hadleigh. Cites Copinger, "Manors, III. p.
164; "Proc.S.I.A.," XI. p 212-3.
11. Hervy, The Visitation of Suffolk
1561, (Courtesy of Suellen
(Clopton) DeLoach Blanton), p. 22, He was left property in Hawkedon in his
father's will.
12. Hervy, The Visitation of Suffolk
1561, (Courtesy of Suellen
(Clopton) DeLoach Blanton), p. 22, States he was left the Manor of Toppesfield
in Hadleigh in his father's will.
13. Hervy, The Visitation of Suffolk
1561, (Courtesy of Suellen
(Clopton) DeLoach Blanton), p. 22, His will was dated May 5, 1413.
14. Hervy, The Visitation of Suffolk
1561, (Courtesy of Suellen
(Clopton) DeLoach Blanton), p. 22, Citing Woodforde, "Norwich School of
Glass-Painting in the Fifteenth Century," p. 126: "Remains of wife's portrait in
Melford church glass, 'her face is very fragmentary. Her robe is of red glass. Her mantle bears the arms of Clopton with two annulets
interlaced on the bend. Beneath,
Uxor Walteri Cloptn filie Johes Peceot ml.'"Erwin, Ancestry of William
Clopton," page 252 states Elizabeth is "probably dau. Sir John
Peecot," but cites no source nor give further evidence.And Harleian
Manuscripts 1103 and 1560, states she is the "dau. of . . .
Pygott." An old inscription
on the parapet of Melford Church describes the daughter of Sir John Peecot as wife
of Walter Clopton, son of William Clopton of Wickhambrook and Amitis Grey.
15. Hervy, The Visitation of Suffolk
1561, (Courtesy of Suellen
(Clopton) DeLoach Blanton), p. 22, His father left him the Manor of Newenham in
Ashdon, County Essex.
16. Parker, History of Long Melford, (Courtesy of William Purcell Clopton),
Clopton Pedigree.
17. Weis, The Magna Charta Sureties, (Copy located Clopton Family Archives,
courtesy of Suellen (Clopton) DeLoach Blanton), p. 57, 64, 89, 93.
18. Complete Peerage, (Courtesy of Suellen (Clopton) DeLoach
Blanton), Volume 2 p. 45, The surname is spelled De Beauchamp in Burke's
Dormant and Extinct Peerages, page 33.
19. Reyce, Suffolk in the XVIIth Century, (Courtesy Martin Wood, LL.B., M.A.
& Suellen (Clopton) DeLoach Blanton), p. 218., Reyce connects the Beauchamp
family with the Clopton family of Long Melford. "The Complete Peerage" and "Burke's Dormant
and Extinct Peerages" record the marriage. "Claiborne of Virginia," page 727, cites Frederick
Lewis Weis, "Ancestral Roots of Certain American Colonists Who Came to
America before 1700 " (7th ed., with additions and corrections by Walter
Lee Sheppard, Jr.; Baltimore, 1992).
Bank's "Baronia Anglica Concentrata also recognized the marriage
and specifically notes William Clopton as her father. The 1612 Visitation of Essex Bendish pedigree notes that
Alice Clopton, daughter of Walter Clopton, Johane's brother, married Thomas
Bendish, Esq., the son of Edmond Bendish and Alice, daughter and heir to John
Banington, and Isabell Beauchamp, daughter and coheir to John Beauchamp of
Herford.
20. Complete Peerage of England, (Courtesy of Suellen (Clopton) DeLoach
Blanton), p. 45., "He was aged 17 in 1380, and made proof of his age
(1374) 7 Ric. II, when he had livery of all his lands, viz. Bletsoe, co.
Bedford, Bloxham and Spelsbury, Oxon, and Lydiard Tregoz, Wilts. He was a knight." In 1395 he attended the King into
Ireland."
21. Complete Peerage of England, (Courtesy of Suellen (Clopton) DeLoach
Blanton), p. 45..
22. Parker, History of Long Melford, (Courtesy of William Purcell Clopton),
Clopton pedigree. Does not list
any other marriages nor give further information about this marriage nor any
evidence.
23. Hervy, The Visitation of Suffolk
1561, (Courtesy of Suellen
(Clopton) DeLoach Blanton), p. 22, States: two women, both named Joan Clopton, are generally stated to
have been sisters of Sir William Clopton and to have married, respectively, Sir
Thomas Erpingham, K.G. (A.;B.; Blomefield. IV. 38-9 and
VI. 413-8) and, 1st, Sir Walter Walcote, of co Norfolk and, 2nd Sir Roger
Beauchamp.
24. Records of the Society of the Friends
of St. George's & The Descendants of the Knights of the Garter, Courtesy of
Mr. D.H.B. Chesshyre, L.V.O., M.A., F.S.A., Clarenceux King of Arms &
Secretary of the Order of the Garter.
25. Hervy, The Visitation of Suffolk
1561, (Courtesy of Suellen
(Clopton) DeLoach Blanton), p. 252, He is co-heir with his sister, Jullian upon
his father's death August 1, 1370.
26. Records of the Society of the Friends
of St. George's & The Descendants of the Knights of the Garter, Courtesy of
Mr. D.H.B. Chesshyre, L.V.O., M.A., F.S.A., Clarenceux King of Arms &
Secretary of the Order of the Garter, As a member of the retinue of John of
Gaunt, Duke of Lancaster, Thomas' indenture dated September 13, 1380 stipulates
he should receive 50 marks during peace time, and during war, 20 pounds,
for himself and a servant, the
usual "wages of a batchelor of his sort."
27. Sansbury, An Historical Guide to
Norwich Cathedral, (Courtesy
of Suellen (Clopton) DeLoach Blanton), p. 28, A window opposite Sir Thomas
Erpingham's chantry is known by his name because it once displayed him and his
two wives. Church records state he
is buried with both of his wives.
28. Parker, History of Long Melford, (Courtesy of William Purcell Clopton),
Clopton Pedigree.
29. D'Ewes Collections, Harleian
Manuscripts No. 380, "Sr. Thomas Clopton, Knight, 2d sonne of Walter
de Clopton & Alicia his wife, married Katherine the sole daughter and heire
of William Milde, esquire, who as is conceaved brought vnto this Familie the
Mannor Kentwell and other lands in Melford. This Sr Thomas died a^ 6 R. II, having lived temp. E. II and
E. III."Arms: - Quarterly, 1 and 4, Sable, a bend Ermine, between two
cotises dancette Or; 2 and 3, on a cross four escallops, Weyland, impaling
Argent, a lion rampant Sable, over all a fess coutner compony Or and Azure,
Mylde.He is mentioned in Lady Katherine's codicil, dated February 24, 1403, as
Thomas Clopton, "my late husband." Harleian Manuscript 10 fo. 158 Brit. Mus.
30. Hervy, The Visitation of Suffolk
1561, (Courtesy of Suellen
(Clopton) DeLoach Blanton), p. 23, His will was dated March 8, 1382, proved in
Ipswich October 12, 1383, as 'Thomas de Clopton, Melford, miles' States he is "To be buried
in St. Mary's Chippeleye in choir between my mother's and wife's graves;
residue of goods and chattels to wife Katherine for her and her children, and I
make her executrix.' It is
assumed he refers to the grave of a first wife, although her name is not
known. Will located British
Museum, Harleian Charter, 58. H. 22.
31. Hervy, The Visitation of Suffolk
1561, (Courtesy of Suellen
(Clopton) DeLoach Blanton), p. 23, Refers to their portraits in Long Melford
Church. He wears a tabard of
Clopton with an ermine spot on the bend, she wears a kirtle of Mylde and mantle
of Clopton with the ermine spot.Also, "The Cloptons of Suffolk,"
quotes: "Katherin, d. of
Mylde, brought wth her the mannor of Kentwell, in the countie of Suff., to Sr
Thomas Clopton, Knight, being her husband."
32. Knott, Holy Trinity Church Guide to
the Stained Glass, (A
photograph of this window is located Clopton Family Archives, courtesy of
William Purcell Clopton).
33. Engleheart, The Church of St. Mary
the Virgin, (Courtesy of
Suellen (Clopton) DeLoach Blanton), p. 8-9, The monumental brasses of both Sir
William de Tendering and Katherine
Mylde are found in the south chapel of the church. They are considered among the finest in England. Sir, Williams brass, in full armour,
resting his head on his helm, bears a crest of feathers. Citing Weaver's "Funeral
Monuments" Written in 1631, the brass is described: "Upon the Pavement before the high
Aultar lyeth an auncient Gravestone, having thereon the figure of a Knight in
compleat Armour, resting his Head upon his Gauntlet, with this
circumscription: 'Hic iacent
Tumulati, Dominus Willelmus Tendering, miles, et Katherine Clopton uxor eiusdem: obierunt anno Domini 1408." Engleheart notes the incorrect death
date of 1408. Possibly Weaver
misread the date and assumed they both died in that year. Unfortunately, many publications have
used this date of 1408 which is incorrect on both accounts.Also, in her will
dated February 24, 1403, proved June 18, 1403, she states she wishes "to
be buried in the Chapel of the Church of Stoke Neyland on the south side of the
church before the altar of said chapel."
34. Hervy, The Visitation of Suffolk
1561, (Courtesy of Suellen
(Clopton) DeLoach Blanton), p. 23, It is noted he is "usually called a
knight" D'Ewes refers
to him merely as "Esquire."
His effigy is clothed as a knight, see note regarding his death. However, the inscription on the brass
of his daughter, Alice, refers to him as "W'mi Clopton armigeri que obijt"Harleian
Manuscript 1103.
35. Lady Katherine's Codicil, dated
February 24, 1403: "My son
William Clopton to have the Manor of Kentwell Hall if he do not contest my
will. And to have all lands and
tenements called Lutons with a charge of ten marks yearly for ten years. .
." He is mentioned several
times throughout the will. He and
John Howard are to superivse the executors, "Master Henry Thompson and
William Thompson and Wm. Brook."
Harleian Manuscript 10 fo. 158, British Museum.
36. Hervy, The Visitation of Suffolk
1561, (Courtesy of Suellen
(Clopton) DeLoach Blanton), p. 23, Citing "Chorography of Suffolk. 98.;
Chitting Manuscript; facsimile. Conder. plate IX, states he died in August
1446, buried in Melford Church.
"Melford Against the North windowe is a fayre raysed tombe on it
laying an armed k't at his feete an hound couchant of alablaster over him these
coates 1. Clopton 2. or a lyon ramp. sable debruised with a fesse counter
compony or and azure. 3. p'pale Clopton & Drury 4. Clopton empaled with
gules a saultier entre 4 crosletes or at his feete in brasse these
verses:..."Harleian Charter, 58 G. 28.
37. D'Ewes Collections, Harleian
Manuscripts No. 380, And undated will, which was made before her death by
her husband, states: "My wife
margery to have profits of my Manor of Kentewll, but ony 9 marks yearly if she
remarry." .... and
"My wife t have all my lands for her life in Chippeleye, Polyngforde,
Stradesylle, Wykhambrooks and Atteltone. . ."
38. Birch, Suffolk Parish Churches, (Courtesy of Bert Hampton Blanton,
Jr.), p. 126, States there is within the church a "fine large brass in N
aisle to Sir Roger Drury 1400 [?] and wife Margery 1405 [?]."
39. Muskett, Suffolk Manorial Families, (Courtesy of Suellen (Clopton) DeLoach
Blanton), p. 142, Cites D'Ewes Harleian Manuscript 380. "The Visitation of Suffolk,
1561," p. 23, cites "Chorography of Suffolk. 98." quotes
"Melford...another stone fayrely arched on it the pourtrayture of a woman
over hir head Clopton empaled with Drurye, this circumscription. Hic iacet Margeria Clopton filia Rogeri
Drury militis que obijt 19 die mensis Junij a'o D'ni 1420." and Chitting
MS, "...que obijt 11 Junij 1420.
40. D'Ewes Collections, Harleian
Manuscripts No. 380, "William Clopton of Melford, in the Countie of
Suffolk, Esquire, sonne & heire of Sr Thomas Clopton, Knight, married
Margerie, sole daughter & heire of Elias Francis, Esquire. He lieth buried in the north isle of ye
chancell of Melford Church. He
died a 25 H. VI, and lived temp. R. 11. II, H. IV, and H.V.""The
Cloptons of Suffolk," p. 105,
quotes: "Sr. Wm Clopton of Kentwell, Knight, sonne and heire,
maryed the daughter and heire of Hellyas ffrauncis of Norff., and by her had yssue
John Clopton, Esq.; a daughter maryed to Harleston; another to
Denston".Arms: - 1 and 4, Clopton, the bend charged with an ermine spot; 2
and 3, Mylde, impaling Gules, a saltire between four crosses pattee Or,
Francis.Crest: - Out of a ducal coronet a wolf's head Or.
41. Muskett, Suffolk Manorial Families, (Courtesy of Suellen (Clopton) DeLoach
Blanton), p. 142, Cites Harleian Manuscript 384, fo. 135. "The Visitation of Suffolk,
1561," p. 23, citting "Chorography of Suffolk, 98.; and Conder. plate
XII), notes 'Melford On a stone not farre from this tombe [that of Sir William]
fayrely arched is the pourtrayture of a woman, on her gowne p'pale Clopton
& gul. a saultier between 4 crosses or on eche corner of the stone an
escotcheon. 1. Clopton 2. Clopton
empaled with Fraunceys as before upon hir gowne 3. Fraunceys as alone 4. as the
second. Under the pourtrayture Hic
jacet Margeria Clopton nuper uxor W'mi Clopton ac filia et heres Eliae
Fraunceys armigeri que obijt 12 die Junij a'o D'ni 1424."D'Ewes. Harleian Manuscript 384, fo. 135.
42. Hervy, The Visitation of Suffolk
1561, (Courtesy of Suellen
(Clopton) DeLoach Blanton), p. 23, Refers to a second son, Thomas, who married a Eustace. However, to date, there is no other
evidence of this son. Erwin's
"Ancestry of William Clopton," does not mention a second
son."The Cloptons of Suffolk, Visitations of 1561," quotes: "Sr Thomas Clopton of Kentwell,
married Katherine daughter and heire of Mylde of Clare, in the Countie of
Suff., and had yssue --- Clopton, sonne and heire, weh maryed wth the daughter
of Eustace of, ---- and had yssue Sr Wm Clopton, Knight."
43. Harleian Charter No. 48 D. 3, Indenture
of Thomas de Cloptone, Knt. to Dom. Robert de Bockyngg and others, holding his
land in Suffolk, to put Katherine his wife and Thomas his son, in possession
after his death of the said lands:
viz. lands and tenements called Luytones in Melforde, Schymplyngg and
Appleton; also the Manor of Kentewelle, and lands in Chyppeleye, Poselyngworth,
and other places. Dated at
Melforde, Friday before the Feast of St. Andrew the Apostle, 6 Richard II.
TABLE
OF CONTENTS ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
BIBLIOGRAPHY
Comments? Questions? Corrections?
Contact [email protected]
[1] Saint
Crispin’s Day is an excerpt from The Clopton Chronicles, the Ancestors and
Descendants of Sir Thomas Clopton, Knight & Dame Katherine Mylde, and
is the property of the Clopton Family
Genealogical Society which holds the copyright on this material. Permission is granted to quote or
reprint articles for noncommercial use provided credit is given to the CFGS and
to the authors. Prior written
permission must be obtained from the Society for commercial use.
John Henry Knowlton is a
member of The Clopton Family Genealogical Society & Clopton Family Archives
and serves on the Society’s Editorial Advisory Board.
Suellen (Clopton) DeLoach
Blanton is Founder and Executive Director of The Clopton Family Genealogical
Society & Clopton Family Archives.
The Society wishes to
thank Bert Hampton Blanton, Jr.; Mr. D.H.B. Chesshyre, L.V.O., M.A., F.S.A.,
Clarenceux King of Arms & Secretary of the Order of the Garter; Douglas
Elmy, Honorable Secretary, The Society of Archer-Antiquaries, North Humberside,
England; Brian Jones, author of “The English Longbow, With a Short Historical
Background,” http://www.gci-net.com/users/w/wolfsoul/medieval/longbow/the-longbow.html;
Peter Knevitt; and, Martin Wood, LL. B., M.A., author and historian living in
Groton, County Suffolk, England, who serves on the United Kingdom Editorial
Board, The Winthrop Papers, A Project of the Massachusetts Historical Society.
Also thanks to Clopton
descendants Wallace Chandler Clopton; William Purcell Clopton; and, Isabel Lancaster (Clopton)
Steiner.
[2] King Henry king makes a speech reflecting the pride the English took in
the memory of a glorious victory, and, by connecting the Battle of Agincourt
with a holy day, helped reinforce the popular belief that Providence played a
role in England’s fortunes during that historic battle.
[3]
See Of Norman Blood.
[4]
Actually a series of epidemics beginning about 1346. It is estimated that about 1 � million people died between
1349 and 1377. The deaths of so
many people from every rank permitted those who survived and were ambitious and
wise to accumulate wealth and advance themselves socially. See Disease and History,
Frederick F. Cartwright in collaboration with Michael D. Biddiss, Barnes &
Noble, Inc., New York, 1991.
[5]
Polydore Vergil, The Anglica Historia of Polydore Vergil, AD 1485-1573,
translated and edited by D. Hay, Camden Series, 1950. Papel envoy to the court of Henry VI, Piero da Monte, wrote that England, was “a very
wealthy region, abounding in gold and silver and many precious things, full of
pleasures and delights.” It seems
a bit doubtful, however, that even the “poor and humble” innkeepers used silver
vessels.
[6]
Henry V, ‘of Monmouth,’ son of Henry IV and Mary Bohun, ascended the throne in
1413 and reigned until his death August 31, 1422. See Antonia Fraser, The Lives of the Kings & Queens
of England, University of California Press, Berkeley, Los Angeles, 1995, p.
125-131
[7] Edward III (1312-1377) claimed the throne of France by
descent from his mother Isabelle, Princess of France, (1292-1358), the daughter of King Philippe IV of
France (1268-1314).
[8]
The son of Thomas Clopton, Knt, of Kentwell Estate and his wife, Katherine
Mylde, an abbreviated genealogy follows.
Sir William fought under the banner of the Duke of Gloucester. Humphrey Plantagenet, The Duke of
Gloucester (1390-1447, the son of Henry IV, and his wife, Mary de Bohun.
[9]
The husband of Joan Clopton, daughter of William Clopton and his wife, Amitia
or Ivetta Grey, an abbreviated genealogy follows.
[10] In
the 14th and 15th centuries England and France fought the
Hundred Year’s War, a conflict in which the English lost all their French
possessions, except the port of Calais, and France was ravaged by the pillaging
and dislocation of war. And yet
each country emerged stronger at the end.
The aftereffects disrupted England and led to the dynastic Wars of the
Roses between the House of Lancaster and the House of York.
[11]
Azincourt in the Pas-de-Calais.
[12]
Although some scholars have made educated guesses of what this word means, no
one really knows.
[13]
Christopher Rothero, The Armies of Agincourt, Osprey Publishing Limited,
p. 14.
[14]
Christopher Hamme, The Miracle of Agincourt, Was Henry V’s Great Battlefield
Victory or the Inevitable Result of Circumstance? http://www.thehistorynet.com/BritishHeritage/articles/2000/0200_text.htm. Prior to Agincourt, most archers held
their bows horizontally while drawing the arrows back to the waist. This method greatly reduced the bow’s
range and effectiveness. At Agincourt
Henry’s archers employed the superior technique of holding their bows
vertically and drawing the arrows back to the their ears. The English bowmen could shoot nine
arrows per minute and hit targets at 400 yards. Their proficiency took the French completely by surprise.
[15]
1154-1189
[16]
For a detailed study of the longbow, see Robert Hardy, Longbow: A Social and Military History, Privately
Published by the author, 1992; and, Robert Wilkinson-Latham, Phaidon Guide
to Antique Weapons and Armour, Prentice-Hall, Inc., New Jersey, 1981. See also History of the Longbow
by Robert Sanderson at http://gondolin.french.liv.ac.uk/~azaroth/university/longbow.html; The Agincourt
Honor Roll http://www.familychronicle.com/agin_ae.htm; The Battle of Agincourt http://www.aginc.net/battle/index.html;
The English Longbow http://www.gci-net.com/users/w/wolfsoul/medieval/longbow/the-longbow.html; The English Longbowmen http://www.gci-net.com/users/w/wolfsoul/medieval/longbow/longbowmen.html;
The Medieval English Longbow by Robert E. Kaiser, M.A. http://snt.student.utwente.nl/~sagi/artikel/longbow/longbow.html;
and, The Battle of Agincourt: Sources and Interpretations, Anne Curry, Editor, Boydell & Brewer,
Inc., 2000.
[17]
The archers carried a number of different types of arrows designed for
different purposes such as armor piercing and horse killing.
[18]
Contrary to popular opinion , some scholars maintain that the armored knight
was not a helpless turtle when he fell from his horse. In The Battle of Agincourt, http://www.aginc.net/battle/index.html
, there is an interesting analysis of the armored knight.
Knights
who were in good physical shape were very nimble in their battle armor. They took great pride in their strength
and ability to fight in the armor.
They did not need assistance in getting on their horse and could easily
get up if knocked down. Uninformed
writers and scriptwriters have created these myths about knights in armor being
immobile.
[19] Maximum range varied from archer to archer. Skilled strong archers could shoot effectively out to 450
yards. It is obvious that Henry V
wanted to not only reach the first ranks but beyond to strike throughout the
entire French force and goad them to attack. Many sources called the large number of arrows fired an
“arrow storm.”
[20] John Keegan, The Face of Battle, Viking
Press of New York, 1976, p. 90.
[21]
Allison Weir, The Wars of the Roses, Ballentine Books, New York, 1995,
p.64-65/
[22] The forward impetus of the mounted knights was so great that many
impaled their horses on the sharpened stakes. See Keegan, The Face of Battle.
[23] The French crossbowmen and cannoneers could not fire in fear of hitting
their own men.
[24] The majority of the casualties at Agincourt were in the French infantry,
men-at-arms.
[25] The English yeomen archers were bare footed and in most cases bare
legged. They easily moved through
the sucking mud that held the armored French knights and men-at-arms. The archers swarmed around the flanks
of the French columns pulling French infantrymen down and killing them as
quickly as they could with swords, knives, and mallets. A hit to the back of the head or
knee knocked them down then a quick thrust through the eye slit or a gap in the armor plate dispatched the
helpless Frenchman.
[26] Reports of the number of prisoners taken and the number executed vary
from source to source.
[27] In Face of Battle, John Keegan analyzes the circumstances of the
killing of prisoners. The order was
not obeyed immediately because the prisoners were the prisoners of individual
captors and not the King. The
captors were reluctant to sully their honor by killing prisoners against the
law of chivalry. Also there was
the ransom value of the prisoners that the captors did not want to loose. Henry V had to detail 200 archers to
carry out his order. The archers
were not under the law of chivalry and therefore had fewer reasons not to carry
out the kings order. All this took
time so the real amount of time available to kill the prisoners was quite
short, considering that the order was immediately canceled when the French did
not attack. Close to 2000
prisoners were taken back to England to be ransomed.
[28] The New Encyclopaedia Britannica, Volume 1, Micropaedia,
Encyclopaedia Britannica, Inc., Chicago, 1987, p. 148. The French lost 13 members of the
highest nobility, about 1,500 knights, and approximately 4,500 men-at-arms.
[29] Charles Boyce, Shakespeare A to Z, The Essential Reference to His
Plays, His Poems, His Life and Times, and More, A Roundtable Press Book,
Dell Publishing, New York, 1990, p.721.
The only nobleman killed was Edward, Duke of York, who had commanded the
right flank of the army during the battle. Although Shakespeare, in his play, Henry V, paints
the Duke’s death as heroic, he was a big man and very overweight, and it was
reported that he either suffocated to death in his armor or suffered a heart
attack in the press of fighting.
His corpse was put in a huge cauldron of water and boiled all night so
that the flesh dissolved and the bones could be transported back to England
where they were buried in the collegiate church at Forthinghay.
[30]
Boyce, Shakespeare A to Z, p. 180.
The historical Erpingham supported the King’s father, Henry Bolingbroke,
later King Henry IV, when he deposed King Richard II (enacted in Richard II), and later served as his chancellor. Sir Thomas was about 58 years old at the time of the battle,
rather long in the tooth for that period.
[31]
See An Historical Guide to Norwich Cathedral, by Ethelreda Sansbury,
Dean and Chapter of Norwich, 1994, and Norwich Cathedral, A Guidebook. Joan Walton’s first husband was
John Howard, the son of John Howard, Knt., Sheriff of Essex & Hertford and
his wife, Margaret Plaiz.
[32] See Black Death